LONG TERM FOLLOW UP OF THE TWO INCISION TECHNIQUE FOR IMPLANTATION OF THE SUBCUTANEOUS IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER DEFIBRILLATOR

R.E. Knops, T.F. Brouwer

Department of EP Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Abstract

Introduction: The fully Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (SICD) has been introduced as a less invasive option for the prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death (SCD). According to the labeling, the implantation of the device requires three incisions: one pocket incision for the pulse generator and two parasternal incisions to tunnel the lead. These parasternal incisions are a potential source of discomfort and infection. Also the superior parasternal incision leaves a cosmetically notable scar on the upper chest. A less invasive, two incision, implantation technique has recently been introduced that omits the superior parasternal incision. Short term follow-up in a small patient cohort has shown that it is a safe and efficacious alternative for S-ICD implantation and may help to reduce complications. No long term follow up data is available on this technique.
Methods: The two incision technique has been described previously. It makes use of a peelable sheeth to avoid the superior parasternal incision. We performed a retrospective analysis of all the patients in our center that have been implanted with this technique.
Results: A total of 107 S-ICD patients were implanted with the two incision technique (56% male, mean age 40±16, BMI 25 (16.6-37.3). During a total follow up of 180 years patient years (mean 12 months, range 1-48) no dislocations were observed. One S-ICD system was repositioned due to DFT failure. First shock efficacy during DFT was 96% and 75% (6/8) for spontaneous episodes (100% efficacy with multiple shocks). The 1 year inappropriate shock rate was 7.4%. Device function was normal in all patients, and no inappropriate sensing occurred related to the implantation technique. Four infections occurred of which one originated from the parasternal incision.
Conclusions: Long term follow up in a large patient cohort continues to show the safety and effectiveness of the two incision technique for S-ICD implantation. This technique offers physicians a less invasive and simplified implantation procedure for the S-ICD