A SINGLE CENTER LONG-TERM FOLLOW-UP EXPERIENCE OF PEDIATRIC PACEMAKER POPULATION

T. Altin (1), C. Koca (1), A. Ongun (1), O. Akyurek (1), T. Ucar (2), B. Candemir (1), E. Tutar (2), A. Uysalel (3), M. Guldal (1), C. Erol (1)

Ankara University, School of Medicine, Department of Cardiology, Ankara, Turkey (1) Ankara University, School of Medicine, Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Ankara, Turkey (2) Ankara University, School of Medicine, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Ankara, Turkey (3)

Abstract

Introduction: We aimed to investigate long-term results of the children with pacemakers.
Methods: The records of 20 children who underwent pacemaker implantation between December 1984 and September 2012 were investigated.
Results: Baseline and procedural characteristics were summarized in Table 1. Epicardial procedures were performed by cardiac surgeons and transvenous implantations were performed by cardiac electrophysiologists. In the transvenous group, 3 of 6 attempts of lead implantation via cephalic vein cut-down was successful. There were no procedure-related complications. Seven patients in the epicardial group eventually underwent transvenous system implantation at 89±62 months’ (range, 15-171) of follow-up. The number of invasive procedures including the first implantation, lead repositioning, lead and/or generator replacement or lead extraction were 3.2±1.9 times for the epicardial and 2.7±1.8 times for the transvenous group. The follow-up problems were summarized in Table 2. Seven of these patients were symptomatic (syncope in 1, heart failure symptoms in 2, palpitation in 2, and reddening of pacemaker pocket in 2 patients.) The problems were solved by reprogramming in 5, implanting new transvenous leads in 8, lead extraction and new system implantation in 2 patients.
Conclusions: The children with pacemakers have a high incidence of problems in long-term, however, there are plenty of methods for solution.


electromechanical activation parameters
Age (mean±SD) 66±40 (range, 15-153)
Male, n 12
Pacemaker indication, n
Sinoatrial block 1
Atrioventricular block 19
Initial route for implantation, n
Epicardial 9
Transvenous 11
Pacemaker mode, n
VVI 6
VDD 14
Total follow-up time, months (mean±SD)
All patients 134±110 (range, 3-330)
Epicardial group 130±121 (range 12-330)
Transvenous group 140±106 (range, 3-296)

Problems during follow-up
Lead-related problems, n(Capture, sense, including atrial undersensing) 14
System infection, n V
Left ventricular dysfunction, n 1