TRANSVENOUS LEAD EXTRACTION. USING CONVENTIONAL MECHANICAL SYSTEMS. EXPERIENCE WITH EXTRACTION OF 2197 PERMANENTLY IMPLANTED LEADS IN 1295 PTS

A. Kutarski (1), M. Czajkowski (2), R. Pietura (3), K. Boczar (4), M. Polewczyk (5)

Dept. of Cardiology Medical University of Lublin (1), Dept. of Cardiosurgery Medical University of Lublin, Poland (2), Department of Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology Medical University of Lublin, Poland (3) Department of Electrocardiology, John Paul II Hospital, Krakow, Poland (4) Student of Medical University of Warsaw, First Faculty of Medicine, Poland (5)

Abstract

Introduction: It is observed recently rise necessity for transvenous lead extraction (TLE). TLE with conventional technique using mechanical systems, is counted as safer but less effective and more laborious technique.
Objectives: analysis of the effectiveness & safety of mechanical systems for TLE.
Methods: we have extracted 2197 ingrown (PM >12, ICD >6 mths) leads in 1295 pts. (61,6% M) mean age 64.4y, with PM and ICD systems. 73,2% leads were PM-BP, 10,1% - PM – UP and 14,8% ICD –% and 2,0% consisted VDD PM leads. 67,0% - passive fixation and 33,0 – active fixation. 35,6% were RA (RAA, BB), 6,5% LA (CS, CSO), 54,3% RV (RVA, RVOT), 3,5%, LV vein and 0,3% LA or LV (erroneous placement). Mean dwelling time was 82,4 mths. In 42,8% of pts. 2 leads were explanted, in 44,8% - single and in the remaining 12,5 % - 3 (max. 6) leads. The most common (57,0%) indications for TLE were non-infective; local pocket infection and endocarditis and the were less frequent (25,8% & 17,2%).
Results: Aver. procedure time was 110,2 min. (30-420). Lead venous entry approach was used for most (83,8%) of leads; femoral approach were used for free floating leads and combined - (including jugular approach) for extraction of broken leads - in 1,8% and 2,2% respectively. Simple extorsion and traction was utilized in 11,7% for active fixation leads. Full radiol. success: 94,6%; remained tip only 2,3%, led fragment (<4 cm) 2,5% and only 8 leads were left due to high risk of tricuspid valve damage. Clinical success: 98,1%. Major complications appeared in 18 cases (1,39%): 9 hemopericardium (surgery), 4 hemopericardium (drainage) and 1 pleuropericardium (drainage), 1 pleuropericardium (surgary), 1 pulmonary embolism 1 severe hypotonia and 1 cerebral stroke. Minor complications were more frequent (1,7%): pulmonary embolism (3), hemothorax (3), hemopericardium (6) tricuspid regurgitation (4), subclavian vein thrombosis (2) but problems were solved without invasive intervention. 5 procedure related deaths were noted. Technical complications (prolonging procedure, forced to change venous approach and utilize additional technique and tools) happened in 210 (16,2%) cases.
Conclusions: 1. TLE in experienced centre is very effective (nearly 95%) even in cases very old (>20 y) and dual-coil ICD leads 2. In experienced centre it is safe procedure (0,3% of death); major complications are infrequent (1,4%) 3. TLE may to need numerous complementary techniques; disposement of alternative techniques are necessary to completion procedure of 4% procedures 4. Cardio-surgery stand-by is necessary (was utilized in 10/1295 procedures).