Although the electrophysiologic derangement responsible for atrial fibrillation (AF) has been elucidated, how AF remodels the ventricular chamber and affects diastolic function (DF) has not been fully characterized. The previously validated Parametrized Diastolic Filling (PDF) formalism models suction-initiated filling kinematically and generates error-minimized fits to E-wave contours using unique load (x_o), relaxation (c), and stiffness (k) parameters. It predicts that E-wave deceleration time (DT) is a function of both stiffness and relaxation. Ascribing DT_s to stiffness and DT_r to relaxation such that DT=DT_s+DT_r is legitimate because of causality and their predicted and observed high correlation (r=0.82 and r=0.94) with simultaneous (diastatic) chamber stiffness (dP/dV) and isovolumic relaxation (tau), respectively. We analyzed simultaneous echocardiography-cardiac catheterization data and compared 16 age matched, chronic AF subjects to 16, normal sinus rhythm (NSR) subjects (650 beats). All subjects had diastatic intervals. Conventional DF parameters (DT, AT, E_peak, E_dur, E-VTI, E/E’) and E-wave derived PDF parameters (c, k, DT_s, DT_r) were compared. Total DT and DT_s, DT_r in AF were shorter than in NSR (p<0.005), chamber stiffness, (k) in AF was higher than in NSR (p<0.001). For NSR, 75% of DT was due to stiffness and 25% was due to relaxation whereas for AF 81% of DT was due to stiffness and 19% was due to relaxation (p<0.005). We conclude that compared to NSR, increased chamber stiffness is one measurable consequence of chamber remodeling in chronic, rate controlled AF. A larger fraction of E-wave DT in AF is due to stiffness compared to NSR. By trending individual subjects, this method can elucidate and characterize the beneficial or adverse long-term effects on chamber remodeling due to alternative therapies in terms of chamber stiffness and relaxation.